NEWS|| PEPT JUDGMENT

 LP, Obi didn’t prove Tinubu’s conviction in US, says Tribunal


The Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in Abuja, on Wednesday, said the Labour Party and its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, failed to prove that President Tinubu was convicted of drug-related charges in the United States of America.

The five-man panel led by Justice Haruna Tsammani ruled that no record of criminal arrest or conviction was established against Tinubu by the petitioners

He said, “The petitioners failed to show evidence that the president was detained or convicted for any particular offence as alleged by the petitioners.”

The justice clarified that the fine imposed on Tinubu by a United States court was over a civil forfeiture proceeding.

Home
News
Metro Plus
Investigations
Videos
Sports
Politics
Business
HealthWise
Editorial
Columns
Podcast
LP, Obi didn’t prove Tinubu’s conviction in US, says Tribunal
6th September 2023

Tribunal in session
Tribunal in session

Solomon Odeniyi and Idowu Abdullahi
Kindly share this story:


The Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in Abuja, on Wednesday, said the Labour Party and its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, failed to prove that President Tinubu was convicted of drug-related charges in the United States of America.

The five-man panel led by Justice Haruna Tsammani ruled that no record of criminal arrest or conviction was established against Tinubu by the petitioners

He said, “The petitioners failed to show evidence that the president was detained or convicted for any particular offence as alleged by the petitioners.”

The justice clarified that the fine imposed on Tinubu by a United States court was over a civil forfeiture proceeding.

Related News
 Tribunal upholds INEC's authority, discretion in election result transmission
 25% requirement: FCT not special than other states – Tribunal
 Tribunal dismisses EU’s report on 2023 elections tendered by Obi, LP
This is even as the court held that both Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettma were qualified to have contested the last presidential election.

Tsammani, while delivering judgment on the petition by Obi and LP, held that the fine imposed by the US court did not qualify as a fine for fraud or dishonesty provided in Section 137(1)(d) of the Constitution.

Details later…

Comments

Popular Posts